Comments on: Michael Jackson’s Ex-Wife Branded a Drunk! http://www.showbizspy.com/article/189558/michael-jacksons-ex-wife-branded-a-drunk.html Sun, 21 Mar 2010 06:54:29 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8-RC1 hourly 1 By: LAhttp://www.showbizspy.com/article/189558/michael-jacksons-ex-wife-branded-a-drunk.html#comment-41859 LA Mon, 03 Aug 2009 01:28:18 +0000 http://www.showbizspy.com/article/189558/michael-jacksons-ex-wife-branded-a-drunk.html#comment-41859 This guy is just trying to get his name in the press. He should keep his mouth shut. Cleaning fish tanks doesn't make him a expert on Debbie or her private life period. This guy is just trying to get his name in the press. He should keep his mouth shut. Cleaning fish tanks doesn’t make him a expert on Debbie or her private life period.

]]> By: Michael Foreverhttp://www.showbizspy.com/article/189558/michael-jacksons-ex-wife-branded-a-drunk.html#comment-41788 Michael Forever Sun, 02 Aug 2009 12:07:28 +0000 http://www.showbizspy.com/article/189558/michael-jacksons-ex-wife-branded-a-drunk.html#comment-41788 Forgive me here but let's get this into perspective, this gentleman's first thought is to sell his story to the National Enquirer, after he visited Ms Rowe's house to service her fish tanks and thinks he's an authority to talk about whether she should have any contact with her own kids? In my opinion he's yet another person looking for some kind of notoriety that he hasn't earned. All of these type of people couldn't hold a candle to Michael Jackson - this is not news, this is pointless. Why don't you dedicate some time to trawling through the volumes of evidence that proved Michael Jackson innocent? Clear his name so that his children can always hold their heads high? He was an innocent man - he was found an innocent man, and people like this selling their stories are nothing and nobody and should not be mentioned in the same sentance as Michael Jackson.These people are all chancers, the ex employees, the so-called best friends, if any one of them were talking about how badly he was treated and how his tragic life reflected the fact that so many turned their backs on him in his hour of need despite the fact that he helped thousands of people all over the world when they were in trouble. Michael was innocent, not just 'not guilty' - he deserves his name to be cleared and for these low lifes to stop cashing in - because that's all their doing - even his own father!!! What a shame that all these people doing the rounds of the networks now did not bother to stand by him at the time he needed them most - i.e. when he was ALIVE.Frankly I don't care if Debbie drinks - so what? She hasn't even asked for custody, it was merely a story made up by the tabloids. Now they are realising what an enigma Michael was and how they could have listened to him, not he's gone they are moving on to the people who knew him. Sorry to point this out but you would be better served looking into his past and trying to uncover the type of man he was - an honest one. Thousands of us who took the time to do this know that he was innocent. Debbie is not the bad guy in this piece, it's the scrounging ex employees and hangers on that he gave the benefit of the doubt to - because he wasn't judgmental, AND the tabloids for printing such rubbish about him that would be believed by morons who don't have a clue how to reason anything and who believe everything they read.I'm glad Debbie is going to be in the kids' lives, at least someone will make sure that the children are being brought up according to Michael's wishes. Forgive me here but let’s get this into perspective, this gentleman’s first thought is to sell his story to the National Enquirer, after he visited Ms Rowe’s house to service her fish tanks and thinks he’s an authority to talk about whether she should have any contact with her own kids? In my opinion he’s yet another person looking for some kind of notoriety that he hasn’t earned. All of these type of people couldn’t hold a candle to Michael Jackson – this is not news, this is pointless. Why don’t you dedicate some time to trawling through the volumes of evidence that proved Michael Jackson innocent? Clear his name so that his children can always hold their heads high? He was an innocent man – he was found an innocent man, and people like this selling their stories are nothing and nobody and should not be mentioned in the same sentance as Michael Jackson.

These people are all chancers, the ex employees, the so-called best friends, if any one of them were talking about how badly he was treated and how his tragic life reflected the fact that so many turned their backs on him in his hour of need despite the fact that he helped thousands of people all over the world when they were in trouble. Michael was innocent, not just ‘not guilty’ – he deserves his name to be cleared and for these low lifes to stop cashing in – because that’s all their doing – even his own father!!! What a shame that all these people doing the rounds of the networks now did not bother to stand by him at the time he needed them most – i.e. when he was ALIVE.

Frankly I don’t care if Debbie drinks – so what? She hasn’t even asked for custody, it was merely a story made up by the tabloids. Now they are realising what an enigma Michael was and how they could have listened to him, not he’s gone they are moving on to the people who knew him. Sorry to point this out but you would be better served looking into his past and trying to uncover the type of man he was – an honest one. Thousands of us who took the time to do this know that he was innocent. Debbie is not the bad guy in this piece, it’s the scrounging ex employees and hangers on that he gave the benefit of the doubt to – because he wasn’t judgmental, AND the tabloids for printing such rubbish about him that would be believed by morons who don’t have a clue how to reason anything and who believe everything they read.

I’m glad Debbie is going to be in the kids’ lives, at least someone will make sure that the children are being brought up according to Michael’s wishes.

]]>