SM is a 27 yo ADULT, so stop making excuses for her bad behavior. The married man was married and rather than tell him no or keep the affair discreet SM opted to put on a very public show and tell. It doesn’t matter what the married man might have told her or whether or not his marriage “might” have been going through something, HE WAS A MARRIED MAN and she should have walked away/waited until he filed for a divorce before publicly engaging in pda/sexual acts with him or spreading lies about the married man’s wife. You don’t need to know the details to understand that 5 people were hurt by this affair, especially when SM made a big deal out of what JL did to her. You don’t need to know the details when SM is constantly using the media to rub the affair in the married man’s wife’s face.

2)”i have met sienna a few times and she has always been absolutley lovely, ”

You meet SM ONE time and based on this one encounter you think that she is “lovely”? Sounds like something out of a fairytale. First of all, you are fan, so it’s natural that she would be on her best behavior in front of you. Second, ONE encounter with a person isn’t a good predictor of a person’s character(ie-Ted Bundy was a clean cut guy that didn’t send any red flags when people saw him but he was a brutal serial killer/rapist). Third, the biggest indicator of SM character is the manner in which she conducted herself during this affair and this is evidenced in the tons of photo-ops and PR stories that she has graced the public with. Because she won’t lay low/shut up/stop tipping off the paps we know that she is irresponsible, selfish, an attention-seeker,self-centered, a serial liar, lacks compassion/empathy/self-respect, has an exaggerated sense of entitlement, doesn’t respect other women or their relationships, and doesn’t think before she speaks.

3)”but that is her business and doesn’t mean people can go after her and abuse her and vandalise her home.”

If it’s her business then she needs to STOP tipping off the paps so that they can capture her business and STOP publicly playing the victim EVERY WEEK. She can’t say that she wants privacy and then tell the world how she had a semi-breakdown during her affair with a married man. It makes her look like an attention seeker and hypocrite.

4) SM is a liar and she proved this by popping up with the married man after she declared that she was single in the Vogue interview. This woman has shown on mutiple occasions that she will say and do whatever it takes if she can somehow benefit from it, so the vandalization was orchestrated by SM and her mother. If she was so distraught over her house being vandalized, then why did she continue to prance around with the married man? If she is always followed by the paps like you claim, how come no one saw anyone vandalizing SM home?

5)”my advice to u is if u see an article about her just ignore it!! problem solved!!”

My advice to you is that if you don’t like the fact that people won’t employ the “see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil” mentality in regards to SM bad behavior and public affair, then IGNORE IT or worship someone who isn’t having a very public affair with a married man and rubbing it in his wife’s face as she plays the victim. As long as she continues to wage a war against a mother and her 4 kids, people are going to comment. You do not have the authority to tell people what they can and can not write on a message board. A comment like this just shows that you are upset because no one is buying the spin that “SM feels remorse” for what she has done.

6) You are not denying that SM is wrong? Well when you blame others for SM bad behavior, you are doing just that.

7) So now you are acting like you don’t know which Vogue interview I am talking about? That’s okay because all you have proven is that SM fans see what they want to see. You “don’t know which Vogue interview” I am talking about because you don’t want to know or are you acting like this Vogue interview doesn’t exist because it is proof that SM lies?

ok look i don’t want to argue with u, and of course if it had happened to me i would have a different approach but my issue is that people are judging her and vandalising her home on a situation that they don’t know all the details of why/how and for what reason it happened. the only people who know what happened truly are balthazar, sienna and rosetta.

yeas there is a rose glass tint approach if it was someone u like then u would want to stand up for them too!! (by the way who do u like???) i have met sienna a few times and she has always been absolutley lovely, so of course i will try to defend her!

but i am not denying she is wrong if she has had affair with him but that is her business and doesn’t mean people can go after her and abuse her and vandalise her home.

my advice to u is if u see an article about her just ignore it!! problem solved!!

1)”See no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil”: Like SM fans, you are under the impression that “hatred” is any repsonse that doesn’t IGNORE SM bad behavior. SM has shown nothing but contempt for a mother and her 4 kids, and all you can do is whine about how someone is “hating” on SM? Go figure. You have made nothing but excuses for SM and since your excuses have “set me straight”, you want to call them “hatred”. Hatred is flaunting her affair and rubbing it in the faces of the married man’s wife while spreading lies about the married man’s wife.

2)”Do as I say, not as I do”: Like most SM fans, you seem to be under the impression that you don’t have to follow the standards that you impose on others. You are in no position to criticize anyone about posting on a message board since you are here posting such “heart felt” comments to those who won’t condone SM antics. Why do SM fans do that? They will take the time and energy (under the pretense that they could careless) to ost, yet they want to criticize someone else. If this wasn’t a personal issue for you, then why are you even here in the first place. You should take your own advice or better yet remove those rose colored glasses. Just because you like SM, doesn’t make you right.

3) “Pass the buck”: Those who comment on SM bad behavior are not to blame. SM made these choices, so she needs to either change the behavior that got her to this point or stop complaining when things don’t go her way.

4) Lighten up? Once again follow your own advice. Perhaps you should tell this to SM. EVERY WEEK she is the vicim, how is that possible?

5) That’s the problem, when people IGNORE SM she doesn’t go away; she tips off the paps so that they can capture sticking her tongue in the married man’s ear or finds a way to talk about JL.

2) If she had a court junction to stop paps ffrom taking pictures of her, then why are there still pictures of her poppin gup all over the place?

3)Funny that you say that the paps are not allowed to camp outside SM home. SM has been spotted going in and out of her home so if the paps are not allowed to be there, then that means that SM gave them the permission. Thus proving that she set it up and courts attention. SM courts attention, there is no doubt about it. How is she managed to evade the paps on several occasions if the paps are always stalking he or are following her to a extreme level? She went on a trip with the married man to Mexico, yet there weren’t any photos of her sunbathing or kissing all over the married man. So if she was followed to extremes like you claim, there would be pictures of her and the married man together on the Mexixo trip.

4)Taking responsibility is saying that YOU WERE WRONG without sneaking in any stipulations (ie-deflecting from one’s behavior by passing the buck or playing the victim. SM has not taken responsibility for her actions because she finds a way to turn herself into the victim.

5) How many times has SM insisted that she was SINGLE and then showed up in public with the married man? No one believes this single nonsense because she said it in the Vogue interview and then showed up in Italy sticking her tongue in the married man’s ear on Father’s Day and she said that she was single and then showed up on Thanksgiving with the married man. SM is only single while she is promoting something. Give it two weeks or the end of the GI Joe promotion, she will be prancing around with the married man again.

BG has gone back to his wife? And we know this how? Because he was spotted out in public with his wife? Well, he’s pulled this stunt before-go out in public with wife to show everyone that she isn’t suffering and then show up in public with his mistress on a family holiday.

6) SM is a liar and she had proved this over and over again. Would SM vandalize her home if she thought that it would help her? Yes. This is supported by the manner in which she has conducted herself during the affair. She wore the breast-sucking dress on BG’s kid’s birthday, so yes she would trash her own house to make herself out to be the victim.

she had a court injunction put in place end of 2008 to stop paps taking pictures of her in the uk. they aren’t allowed to camp outside her home etc etc!!! so if she was fixing it so they are there to take shots why go through the hassle of a court case!?! yes there are other more famous celebs that manage to be papped less but i think the paps have a bit more respect for them and give them the space!! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QaC9IRx3THE proves that she is followed to extreme levels!!!
she has been quoted recently saying “on the whole, you know, i’ve made some bad choices and done some stupid things” so surely that counts as takin responsibility for her actions. and balthazar has gone back to his wife (more fool her) and sienna insists she is single! so who knows!! all i know is to vandalise somebodies home when it is an issue that doesn’t directly concern you is out of order especially when all the info u have has been sourced from tabloids and trashy magazines!?!?

P.S hey maybe it was u that did it as u seem to hate her so much … talkin of which if u hate her as much as u seem to be provin then why search for stories concernin her and have such heart felt comments on them … surely if u ignore her she might go away, not that i want her too!?! (i am not tryin to offend u in anyway but lighten up)

The paps are harassing SM? It’s more like SM tips them off and then throws a temper tantrum when she doesn’t get the desired outcome(ie-sues the paps for not spinning the affair in her favor). When exactly did SM stop the paps from harassing her? When she tipped them off so that they could capture her vacationing with the married man in Italy not once, not even twice, but three times? She has managed to avoid the paps on several occasions, so if she doesn’t want to be seen/heard believe me she would not be seen/heard. Not to mention there are celebs who are more famous than SM who manage to keep their private lives private. So if these celebs can do this, then you know that SM can do the same.

2)”is merely expressing how her decision whether it be right or wrong has had this effect!!”

Considering that she went off on the DJ for even bringing up BG and keeps whining about how she doesn’t have any privacy, she is no position to talk about how she had a “breakdown”. What’s missing from SM “breakdown” sob story? REMORSE or EMPATHY. For someone who claims to care so much about the plight of women and children, rehashing this story just shows how little respect and empathy she has for other women. Not once does she consider how the affair was hurtful towards RG and her 4 kids and she proved this by showing up with the married man on Father’s Day. This is just another “me,me, me ,look at me” stunt where she once again blames someone else for her bad actions and tries to act as if she is suffering more than the real victims.

3) In regards to the vandalization, it was just another stunt orchestrated by SM and her mothers to gain sympathy. Why? Check out her Vogue interview and what she did immediately following it. She has proven that she would do just about anything to get people to feel sorry for her. If she lied about being single and learning her lesson in the Vogue interview, then what else is she lying about? SM lies and we have all of her staged photo-ops and PR releases as proof. Like she pretends that her parents have morals(ie-can’t see her sex scenes), yet her own mother was sitting right next to her as she kissed the married man topless.

4) SM isn’t having this affair because she was hurt by JL. That is just another attempt to blame someone else for her bad behavior. She was cheated on, so she goes and hurts another woman who has done nothing to hurt her? That makes SM sound vindictive.

5)The only one twisting anything is SM. To deflect from her bad behavior she plays the victim, passes the buck, depicts the married man’s wife as a villian, or put outs stories about her “great beauty and sense of style”. If she was smart, she would stop this nonsense. Every week, the public has to hear about how everything that happens to her is someone else’s fault. Where is her accountability? Instead of trying to twist things in her favor, why won’t she just do the right thing?

What is there to like about a woman who is so utterly disrespectful towards other women and will stoop to any means to demean another human being just because she wants that woman’s husband/boyfriend? I would understand if she took some responsibility for her actions, but she wants to escape all of the consequences of her actions while being allowed to continue the behavior that got her into trouble. She has no right to whine about how she had a semi-breakdown when she was spotted sticking her tongue in the married man’s ear and tried to justify it with the “just friends” defense, say that the married man and his wife have an open relationship, or bring up how her house was “vandalized”. The simplest solution would be to wait until the married man files for a divorce and then stage those photo-ops.

2)”i haven’t seen any critisim on getty’s part!!”

I have seen tons of critism of BG. BG lost his job and has been called by every name in the book. Everytime someone says that the married man is 100% responsible for the affair (while SM gets a free pass simply because she was the single one and wasn’t the one who made any promises to BG’s wife), that is a criticism of BG and a double standard(it implies that BG is responsible for SM actions and that women don’t have to respect the relationships of other women/take responsibility for their actions). The biggest difference between SM and BG is that he LAYS LOW and keeps his mouth shut. When people call him names, he does’t counteract it by whining about how the public has a vendetta against him or how their is no brotherhood. He doesn’t put out sob stories about how he had a “semi-breakdown” during the course of the affair. If she doesn’t like being called a homewrecker, then she needs to stop sleeping with a married man and acting as if she is entitled to do so. If she doesn’t like being called a “slut”, then perhaps she should stop going after men who are attached to other women and then rubbing the affair in these women’s faces. She gets no sympathy because she still continues to flaunt her affair knowing full well that it is hurtful.

By that same logic, SM knew that BG was a married man and still knows that he is a married man, so where was/is SM self-control and why didn’t/doesn’t she have the decency to tell the married man no?

If her house was “vandazalized”, then it was probably at the hands of SM and her mother. Funny, how those paps who are always stalking her so much so that she has to move to another place to get away from them didn’t catch anyone writing “slut” on her house.

So why was it not okay for the DJ to ask about BG, but is now okay for her to “reveal how she suffered a breakdown following the controversy surrounding her highly-publicized affair with married actor Balthazar Getty”? Why was it okay for her to ridicule JL for his infidelity, but not okay for the public to hold her to the same standard that she imposes on JL? For once in her life she needs to take responsibility for her actions and stop playing the victim. It’s not the public’s fault that she had a “semi-breakdown over her very public affair with a married man”. If everything was just too much/she thought it wasn’t worth it, then she should have BACKED OFF and left the married man alone until he filed for a divorce.

Despite what she says, SM has not(nor will she ever) suffer more than the married man’s wife and kids. So someone(aka SM and her mother) “vandalized” her house, how does that compare to seeing tons of pictures of one’s husband publicly sucking/grabbing on another woman’s breast in public and then to have that very same woman spread lies about oneself? She was/is having a very public affair with a still very married man and didn’t/doesn’t care about the breakdown that was/is caused by those photos of her publicly engaging in pda/sexual acts with the married man or prancing around all over the place with the married man, so no one really cares about her “broken spirit, semi-breakdown, or how she was living in fear”. If she wanted to “run away, had broken spirit, couldn’t leave her house, or living in a state of fear”, then imagine how RG and her 4 kids must have felt. In an attempt to play the victim and justify her affair, she just made herself look much worse (which I didn’t think was even possible considering that her public image is as low as it can go)and made the public even more sympathetic towards RG and her 4 kids.