<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Natalie Portman: &#8216;Jake Gyllenhaal is Ugly&#8217;</title> <atom:link href="http://www.showbizspy.com/article/195415/natalie-portman-jake-gyllenhaal-is-ugly.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.showbizspy.com/article/195415/natalie-portman-jake-gyllenhaal-is-ugly.html</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 10:34:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator> <item><title>By: Ahahaha</title><link>http://www.showbizspy.com/article/195415/natalie-portman-jake-gyllenhaal-is-ugly.html#comment-489556</link> <dc:creator>Ahahaha</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 18:41:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.showbizspy.com/article/195415/natalie-portman-jake-gyllenhaal-is-ugly.html#comment-489556</guid> <description>I think Jake Gyllenhaal is good looking, but that&#039;s my opinion. Anyway I think Natalie Portman saying he is ugly was waaaaaayyy out of line. Let alone, during a magazine interview! You think it&#039;s ok because you think he&#039;s ugly, but still it was offensive. I hope she was joking.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Jake Gyllenhaal is good looking, but that&#8217;s my opinion. Anyway I think Natalie Portman saying he is ugly was waaaaaayyy out of line. Let alone, during a magazine interview! You think it&#8217;s ok because you think he&#8217;s ugly, but still it was offensive. I hope she was joking.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: tom</title><link>http://www.showbizspy.com/article/195415/natalie-portman-jake-gyllenhaal-is-ugly.html#comment-405449</link> <dc:creator>tom</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 20 Feb 2011 06:34:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.showbizspy.com/article/195415/natalie-portman-jake-gyllenhaal-is-ugly.html#comment-405449</guid> <description>To correct the statement by &quot;Chris Liberty&quot;, Roman Polanski did NOT use Quinine pill(s) to sedate the 13 year old girl, he used a Quaalude pill, which is very different.Quinine is an drug that can keep malaria at bay but not kill it. It doesn&#039;t sedate people. Quinine is in Tonic Water and some carbonated waters and drinks, it can ease arthritis pains.A Quaalude is a very strong depressant drug which is similar to Barbiturates or Benzodiazepines but is supposedly more dangerous than Barbiturates. Benzodiazepines are the safest of the three in overdose, generally.He used the Quaalude pill to sedate the girl, kind of like when you go for a colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy. It would have effectively given her a concious sedation.Basically he used a &quot;date-rape&quot; pill to calm his victim down and make her less likely to be able to be afraid and she would&#039;ve just let the sexual assault happen since she would be in a daze and out of it.He (Roman Polanski) is a pervert and rapist. Natalie Portman is a dumb jew just like Polanski, and I&#039;m a Jew also, but these jews give us a bad name. They are sickening, and Natalie Portman is plain ugly!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To correct the statement by &#8220;Chris Liberty&#8221;, Roman Polanski did NOT use Quinine pill(s) to sedate the 13 year old girl, he used a Quaalude pill, which is very different.</p><p>Quinine is an drug that can keep malaria at bay but not kill it. It doesn&#8217;t sedate people. Quinine is in Tonic Water and some carbonated waters and drinks, it can ease arthritis pains.</p><p>A Quaalude is a very strong depressant drug which is similar to Barbiturates or Benzodiazepines but is supposedly more dangerous than Barbiturates. Benzodiazepines are the safest of the three in overdose, generally.</p><p>He used the Quaalude pill to sedate the girl, kind of like when you go for a colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy. It would have effectively given her a concious sedation.</p><p>Basically he used a &#8220;date-rape&#8221; pill to calm his victim down and make her less likely to be able to be afraid and she would&#8217;ve just let the sexual assault happen since she would be in a daze and out of it.</p><p>He (Roman Polanski) is a pervert and rapist. Natalie Portman is a dumb jew just like Polanski, and I&#8217;m a Jew also, but these jews give us a bad name. They are sickening, and Natalie Portman is plain ugly!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Aiefniaea</title><link>http://www.showbizspy.com/article/195415/natalie-portman-jake-gyllenhaal-is-ugly.html#comment-217297</link> <dc:creator>Aiefniaea</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 11 Sep 2010 08:25:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.showbizspy.com/article/195415/natalie-portman-jake-gyllenhaal-is-ugly.html#comment-217297</guid> <description>...Jake is the sexiest man I&#039;ve ever seen and I&#039;d take him on the cold hard floor.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;Jake is the sexiest man I&#8217;ve ever seen and I&#8217;d take him on the cold hard floor.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: james</title><link>http://www.showbizspy.com/article/195415/natalie-portman-jake-gyllenhaal-is-ugly.html#comment-205256</link> <dc:creator>james</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 14:43:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.showbizspy.com/article/195415/natalie-portman-jake-gyllenhaal-is-ugly.html#comment-205256</guid> <description>She&#039;s pretty for a woman that looks like a little boy.Let&#039;s be clear - she&#039;s not glamorous by any stretch. And she&#039;s a bitch.Apparently she doesn&#039;t believe in God but clings hardcore to Judaism which is hypocritical to the core. I guess she wants to keep the &#039;chosen&#039; part so that she can look down on other people.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She&#8217;s pretty for a woman that looks like a little boy.</p><p>Let&#8217;s be clear &#8211; she&#8217;s not glamorous by any stretch. And she&#8217;s a bitch.</p><p>Apparently she doesn&#8217;t believe in God but clings hardcore to Judaism which is hypocritical to the core. I guess she wants to keep the &#8216;chosen&#8217; part so that she can look down on other people.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Say WHAT?</title><link>http://www.showbizspy.com/article/195415/natalie-portman-jake-gyllenhaal-is-ugly.html#comment-131301</link> <dc:creator>Say WHAT?</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 16:55:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.showbizspy.com/article/195415/natalie-portman-jake-gyllenhaal-is-ugly.html#comment-131301</guid> <description>He IS ugly!  Very.  But some women like that shit.  Me, I think he is majorly a fugmonster.  So is his sister Maggie - what a dog she is.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He IS ugly!  Very.  But some women like that shit.  Me, I think he is majorly a fugmonster.  So is his sister Maggie &#8211; what a dog she is.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: ana</title><link>http://www.showbizspy.com/article/195415/natalie-portman-jake-gyllenhaal-is-ugly.html#comment-92246</link> <dc:creator>ana</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 02:55:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.showbizspy.com/article/195415/natalie-portman-jake-gyllenhaal-is-ugly.html#comment-92246</guid> <description>where did you saw the clip?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>where did you saw the clip?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: scoot</title><link>http://www.showbizspy.com/article/195415/natalie-portman-jake-gyllenhaal-is-ugly.html#comment-52179</link> <dc:creator>scoot</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 18:09:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.showbizspy.com/article/195415/natalie-portman-jake-gyllenhaal-is-ugly.html#comment-52179</guid> <description>I usually stay away from a lot of news due to a lot of it being construed unclearly or bias by underlying media agendas, but unless you&#039;ve seen the clip, don&#039;t go in half-cocked spewing obcenities.  In regards to Chris Liberty agenda, how do you know you have the full picture?  Isn&#039;t that what the court is to present and place judgement on?  Rarely are people privy to such details to what is happening, and if they are, that proximity may place that person squarely on one side, without seeing the other.  I&#039;m not making a call on this, he maybe guilty or may not... and Samantha is involved in this case and rightly puts her within her rights to propose a dismissal.  Just hope those investigating find the true reason behind and proceed accordingly.  You have to realize to, that RP is friends with those... friends of which do just that, support and believe their friend.  I&#039;d like to believe my close friends would be honest with me.  Not to say in this day and age that sometimes face value is rare and noone should just take their word.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I usually stay away from a lot of news due to a lot of it being construed unclearly or bias by underlying media agendas, but unless you&#8217;ve seen the clip, don&#8217;t go in half-cocked spewing obcenities.  In regards to Chris Liberty agenda, how do you know you have the full picture?  Isn&#8217;t that what the court is to present and place judgement on?  Rarely are people privy to such details to what is happening, and if they are, that proximity may place that person squarely on one side, without seeing the other.  I&#8217;m not making a call on this, he maybe guilty or may not&#8230; and Samantha is involved in this case and rightly puts her within her rights to propose a dismissal.  Just hope those investigating find the true reason behind and proceed accordingly.  You have to realize to, that RP is friends with those&#8230; friends of which do just that, support and believe their friend.  I&#8217;d like to believe my close friends would be honest with me.  Not to say in this day and age that sometimes face value is rare and noone should just take their word.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: DeeDee</title><link>http://www.showbizspy.com/article/195415/natalie-portman-jake-gyllenhaal-is-ugly.html#comment-52175</link> <dc:creator>DeeDee</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 16:52:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.showbizspy.com/article/195415/natalie-portman-jake-gyllenhaal-is-ugly.html#comment-52175</guid> <description>come on guys she was joking! It was a joke! get over it....</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>come on guys she was joking! It was a joke! get over it&#8230;.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tess</title><link>http://www.showbizspy.com/article/195415/natalie-portman-jake-gyllenhaal-is-ugly.html#comment-52172</link> <dc:creator>Tess</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 16:27:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.showbizspy.com/article/195415/natalie-portman-jake-gyllenhaal-is-ugly.html#comment-52172</guid> <description>Sarcasm.  Look it up.  She is saying that he is perfect.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sarcasm.  Look it up.  She is saying that he is perfect.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: chase</title><link>http://www.showbizspy.com/article/195415/natalie-portman-jake-gyllenhaal-is-ugly.html#comment-52170</link> <dc:creator>chase</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 16:16:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.showbizspy.com/article/195415/natalie-portman-jake-gyllenhaal-is-ugly.html#comment-52170</guid> <description>He&#039;s hot all the way around.  And a great guy in person.  And a good actor on his way to be a great actor.  Sounds to me like Ms. Portman has issues with her sexuality and men period.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He&#8217;s hot all the way around.  And a great guy in person.  And a good actor on his way to be a great actor.  Sounds to me like Ms. Portman has issues with her sexuality and men period.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: DIANE</title><link>http://www.showbizspy.com/article/195415/natalie-portman-jake-gyllenhaal-is-ugly.html#comment-52148</link> <dc:creator>DIANE</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 09:56:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.showbizspy.com/article/195415/natalie-portman-jake-gyllenhaal-is-ugly.html#comment-52148</guid> <description>WELL, JAKE MAY BE,AS YOU SAY, UGLY,BUT THAT&#039;S ONLY YOUR OPINION,WHICH YOU HAVE A RIGHT TO, BUT JAKE IS A FANTASTIC ACTOR,AND I THINK HE AND HEATH BOTH SHOULD HAVE WON OSCARS FOR BROKEBACK,THEIR ACTING IN IT WAS SUPERB.BESIDES ALL THAT THO,JAKE ,I THINK, IS JUST AN ALL AROUND GOOD GUY,AND HE OBVIOUSLY ADORES REESE. I HOPE SHE DOESN&#039;T REALIZE WHAT SHE HAS WHEN IT&#039;S TOO LATE, HE&#039;S NOT GOING TO WAIT AROUND FOREVER, I IMAGINE HE WANTS KIDS OF HIS OWN.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WELL, JAKE MAY BE,AS YOU SAY, UGLY,BUT THAT&#8217;S ONLY YOUR OPINION,WHICH YOU HAVE A RIGHT TO, BUT JAKE IS A FANTASTIC ACTOR,AND I THINK HE AND HEATH BOTH SHOULD HAVE WON OSCARS FOR BROKEBACK,THEIR ACTING IN IT WAS SUPERB.BESIDES ALL THAT THO,JAKE ,I THINK, IS JUST AN ALL AROUND GOOD GUY,AND HE OBVIOUSLY ADORES REESE. I HOPE SHE DOESN&#8217;T REALIZE WHAT SHE HAS WHEN IT&#8217;S TOO LATE, HE&#8217;S NOT GOING TO WAIT AROUND FOREVER, I IMAGINE HE WANTS KIDS OF HIS OWN.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Josie3</title><link>http://www.showbizspy.com/article/195415/natalie-portman-jake-gyllenhaal-is-ugly.html#comment-52140</link> <dc:creator>Josie3</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 06:57:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.showbizspy.com/article/195415/natalie-portman-jake-gyllenhaal-is-ugly.html#comment-52140</guid> <description>Jake is so hot i&#039;ll take him.  What is up?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jake is so hot i&#8217;ll take him.  What is up?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Lynn</title><link>http://www.showbizspy.com/article/195415/natalie-portman-jake-gyllenhaal-is-ugly.html#comment-52135</link> <dc:creator>Lynn</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 06:38:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.showbizspy.com/article/195415/natalie-portman-jake-gyllenhaal-is-ugly.html#comment-52135</guid> <description>Are you all frigging idiots?  Did no one read the story? She &quot;joked&quot; about his looks.  (See paragraph two.)  By the way, a Harvard educated woman with the experience of Portman, does not seriously call another actor ugly.  She&#039;s way too smart and sober for that.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you all frigging idiots?  Did no one read the story? She &#8220;joked&#8221; about his looks.  (See paragraph two.)  By the way, a Harvard educated woman with the experience of Portman, does not seriously call another actor ugly.  She&#8217;s way too smart and sober for that.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Gina</title><link>http://www.showbizspy.com/article/195415/natalie-portman-jake-gyllenhaal-is-ugly.html#comment-52131</link> <dc:creator>Gina</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 06:06:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.showbizspy.com/article/195415/natalie-portman-jake-gyllenhaal-is-ugly.html#comment-52131</guid> <description>you know maybe just maybe... she was being facetious - geez people take a chill pill.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you know maybe just maybe&#8230; she was being facetious &#8211; geez people take a chill pill.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Andrea</title><link>http://www.showbizspy.com/article/195415/natalie-portman-jake-gyllenhaal-is-ugly.html#comment-52126</link> <dc:creator>Andrea</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 05:15:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.showbizspy.com/article/195415/natalie-portman-jake-gyllenhaal-is-ugly.html#comment-52126</guid> <description>She has a right to her opinion, but I&#039;m sure there are people out there who don&#039;t think she is particularly attractive. Not everyone sees the same thing when they look at a person. When people make nasty unwarranted comments like that about someone else, any shred of beauty they may have completely disintegrates, in my opinion.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She has a right to her opinion, but I&#8217;m sure there are people out there who don&#8217;t think she is particularly attractive. Not everyone sees the same thing when they look at a person. When people make nasty unwarranted comments like that about someone else, any shred of beauty they may have completely disintegrates, in my opinion.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kaley</title><link>http://www.showbizspy.com/article/195415/natalie-portman-jake-gyllenhaal-is-ugly.html#comment-52103</link> <dc:creator>Kaley</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 01:48:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.showbizspy.com/article/195415/natalie-portman-jake-gyllenhaal-is-ugly.html#comment-52103</guid> <description>Oh no she didn&#039;t. Jake is superrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr HOT! She&#039;s just jealous CUZ she is UGLY!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh no she didn&#8217;t. Jake is superrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr HOT! She&#8217;s just jealous CUZ she is UGLY!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: NanD</title><link>http://www.showbizspy.com/article/195415/natalie-portman-jake-gyllenhaal-is-ugly.html#comment-52102</link> <dc:creator>NanD</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 01:34:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.showbizspy.com/article/195415/natalie-portman-jake-gyllenhaal-is-ugly.html#comment-52102</guid> <description>You people need to get a grip--getting way too wrapped up in the stars lives.  She was joking, I saw the live clip when she was saying this. As for the Roman Polanski petition, if that is indeed true, I am disappointed in her and in any others that may have signed it.  However, my opinion has always been and still is...the stars are merely entertainment.  I don&#039;t let their opinions influence me one way or the other.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You people need to get a grip&#8211;getting way too wrapped up in the stars lives.  She was joking, I saw the live clip when she was saying this. As for the Roman Polanski petition, if that is indeed true, I am disappointed in her and in any others that may have signed it.  However, my opinion has always been and still is&#8230;the stars are merely entertainment.  I don&#8217;t let their opinions influence me one way or the other.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: k</title><link>http://www.showbizspy.com/article/195415/natalie-portman-jake-gyllenhaal-is-ugly.html#comment-51822</link> <dc:creator>k</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 08:56:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.showbizspy.com/article/195415/natalie-portman-jake-gyllenhaal-is-ugly.html#comment-51822</guid> <description>Jake is adorable and too good a person to be a movie actor, but he&#039;s a damn good one. What a mean thing to say, but then look at who&#039;s saying it. How arrogant.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jake is adorable and too good a person to be a movie actor, but he&#8217;s a damn good one. What a mean thing to say, but then look at who&#8217;s saying it. How arrogant.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: jdawson</title><link>http://www.showbizspy.com/article/195415/natalie-portman-jake-gyllenhaal-is-ugly.html#comment-51594</link> <dc:creator>jdawson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 03:22:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.showbizspy.com/article/195415/natalie-portman-jake-gyllenhaal-is-ugly.html#comment-51594</guid> <description>Its shocking to hear a comment like that come out of one the most beautiful ladies of hollywood. But I think Natalie was not being mean, she was just being honest. The truth hurts, and to say Jake Gyllenhaal is  remotely handsome, I feel I would be telling the biggest lie.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its shocking to hear a comment like that come out of one the most beautiful ladies of hollywood. But I think Natalie was not being mean, she was just being honest. The truth hurts, and to say Jake Gyllenhaal is  remotely handsome, I feel I would be telling the biggest lie.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chris Liberty</title><link>http://www.showbizspy.com/article/195415/natalie-portman-jake-gyllenhaal-is-ugly.html#comment-51576</link> <dc:creator>Chris Liberty</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 02:02:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.showbizspy.com/article/195415/natalie-portman-jake-gyllenhaal-is-ugly.html#comment-51576</guid> <description>Joey Jay, the victim doesn&#039;t decide what the legalities of a crime are.  That&#039;s our judicial system.  Got it?  If you murder someone, it doesn&#039;t matter how forgiving their family might be.  The crime was still done, just like the child rape was done!  Justice should be tossed upon the perpetrator. Got it, yet?!  It might weigh in Roman &quot;child molestor&quot; Polanski&#039;s favor that Samantha just wants the case to be dropped, especially after he paid her, but he should still be tried.  Unless, of course, he&#039;s going to run away again!  What about that don&#039;t you get?  Is it because you like RP&#039;s movies, and so he should be allowed to go free?  Is it because it was done just so long ago?  I believe that, regardless of a crime&#039;s age, a wrong should be righted!  So, knock off your loony crap that because the victim isn&#039;t supporting the judicial aspects of what happened, RP should go free.  A jury of RP&#039;s peers will decide that.  Not You, Samantha, those loony celebs, or anyone else!  Stop sucking the helium of immorality and gain some moral gravity, pal!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joey Jay, the victim doesn&#8217;t decide what the legalities of a crime are.  That&#8217;s our judicial system.  Got it?  If you murder someone, it doesn&#8217;t matter how forgiving their family might be.  The crime was still done, just like the child rape was done!  Justice should be tossed upon the perpetrator. Got it, yet?!  It might weigh in Roman &#8220;child molestor&#8221; Polanski&#8217;s favor that Samantha just wants the case to be dropped, especially after he paid her, but he should still be tried.  Unless, of course, he&#8217;s going to run away again!  What about that don&#8217;t you get?  Is it because you like RP&#8217;s movies, and so he should be allowed to go free?  Is it because it was done just so long ago?  I believe that, regardless of a crime&#8217;s age, a wrong should be righted!  So, knock off your loony crap that because the victim isn&#8217;t supporting the judicial aspects of what happened, RP should go free.  A jury of RP&#8217;s peers will decide that.  Not You, Samantha, those loony celebs, or anyone else!  Stop sucking the helium of immorality and gain some moral gravity, pal!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: joey jay</title><link>http://www.showbizspy.com/article/195415/natalie-portman-jake-gyllenhaal-is-ugly.html#comment-51571</link> <dc:creator>joey jay</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 01:39:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.showbizspy.com/article/195415/natalie-portman-jake-gyllenhaal-is-ugly.html#comment-51571</guid> <description>&quot;Meanwhile, Polanski&#039;s victim, Samantha Geimer, long ago announced that she had forgiven the filmmaker for his transgressions and supported various efforts to have the case against him dismissed.&quot;Enough said. Not any of our business. Have an opinion. Get over it she did and she went throught it! Again NUFF SAID!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Meanwhile, Polanski&#8217;s victim, Samantha Geimer, long ago announced that she had forgiven the filmmaker for his transgressions and supported various efforts to have the case against him dismissed.&#8221;</p><p>Enough said. Not any of our business. Have an opinion. Get over it she did and she went throught it! Again NUFF SAID!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chris Liberty</title><link>http://www.showbizspy.com/article/195415/natalie-portman-jake-gyllenhaal-is-ugly.html#comment-51550</link> <dc:creator>Chris Liberty</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 21:02:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.showbizspy.com/article/195415/natalie-portman-jake-gyllenhaal-is-ugly.html#comment-51550</guid> <description>I actually meant to say that it&#039;s not JUST a difference in values.  Definately, there is a BIG difference in our values.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually meant to say that it&#8217;s not JUST a difference in values.  Definately, there is a BIG difference in our values.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chris Liberty</title><link>http://www.showbizspy.com/article/195415/natalie-portman-jake-gyllenhaal-is-ugly.html#comment-51549</link> <dc:creator>Chris Liberty</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:54:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.showbizspy.com/article/195415/natalie-portman-jake-gyllenhaal-is-ugly.html#comment-51549</guid> <description>No big deal?  If you&#039;re talking about her comment about Jake G, I&#039;d agree with you.  I think he&#039;s ugly, too, but he&#039;s not MY friend, and I&#039;d never say anything like that about a friend of mine, let alone in a magazine article.  The Polanski thing, that&#039;s different.  It&#039;s not a difference in values.  It makes me wonder if she HAS any values.  I thought she was better than that.  I used to consider her a great actress.  Now, I just consider her a supporter of a child molestor.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No big deal?  If you&#8217;re talking about her comment about Jake G, I&#8217;d agree with you.  I think he&#8217;s ugly, too, but he&#8217;s not MY friend, and I&#8217;d never say anything like that about a friend of mine, let alone in a magazine article.  The Polanski thing, that&#8217;s different.  It&#8217;s not a difference in values.  It makes me wonder if she HAS any values.  I thought she was better than that.  I used to consider her a great actress.  Now, I just consider her a supporter of a child molestor.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: sam</title><link>http://www.showbizspy.com/article/195415/natalie-portman-jake-gyllenhaal-is-ugly.html#comment-51547</link> <dc:creator>sam</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:44:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.showbizspy.com/article/195415/natalie-portman-jake-gyllenhaal-is-ugly.html#comment-51547</guid> <description>I think she is one of the most beautiful actresses in Hollywood. People are just overreacting to her comment, but it&#039;s really no big deal.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think she is one of the most beautiful actresses in Hollywood. People are just overreacting to her comment, but it&#8217;s really no big deal.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chris Liberty</title><link>http://www.showbizspy.com/article/195415/natalie-portman-jake-gyllenhaal-is-ugly.html#comment-51545</link> <dc:creator>Chris Liberty</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:39:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.showbizspy.com/article/195415/natalie-portman-jake-gyllenhaal-is-ugly.html#comment-51545</guid> <description>Oh!  BTW, Natalie says she might run for elected office when she&#039;s &quot;too ugly for Hollywood.&quot;  Based on her true, but mean comments about Jake G, and her name on that petition to free Roman Polanski, I think it&#039;s safe to say that we can expect her name on a state ballot for some office in 2010, right?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh!  BTW, Natalie says she might run for elected office when she&#8217;s &#8220;too ugly for Hollywood.&#8221;  Based on her true, but mean comments about Jake G, and her name on that petition to free Roman Polanski, I think it&#8217;s safe to say that we can expect her name on a state ballot for some office in 2010, right?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chris Liberty</title><link>http://www.showbizspy.com/article/195415/natalie-portman-jake-gyllenhaal-is-ugly.html#comment-51544</link> <dc:creator>Chris Liberty</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:35:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.showbizspy.com/article/195415/natalie-portman-jake-gyllenhaal-is-ugly.html#comment-51544</guid> <description>Yes, Natalie doesn&#039;t want to help out porn sites on the internet, but she has absolutely no problem helping out a child rapist.  TO those of you who don&#039;t know, good old Nat signed a petition calling for Roman &quot;child molestor&quot; Polanski to be released.  Yes, the same Polanski who drugged a 13 year old girl with part of a quinine pill, and raped her anally, orally, and vaginaly, all while she said &quot;No! Stop! Stay Away!&quot;  Of course Portman also likens those of us who eat meat to rape.  She said in a Huffington Post article, &quot;If we don&#039;t tolerate rape, why do we tolerate meat?&quot;  The reason is, dear Nat, is because God gave the animals of the earth to humans to consume for food, THAT&#039;S why!  Since you&#039;re a Jew, like me, I guess that means you believe in the bible.  If eating meat is wrong, I guess you and others like you think God made a bad call!  Wow!  I wouldn&#039;t want to be you on Judgement Day, honey.  But then, why should anyone expect any better from someone who is asking for a child molestor, who never served any time for his crime, to be free.  Natalie, I think you&#039;re sick, so is Harrison Ford, and all the rest of your ilkish friends who damned your names by signing that immoral petition!  You don&#039;t have any moral gravity, nothing keeps your head out of the clouds and grounded.  From hereon, I shall boycott all your movies.  I can&#039;t give my hard-earned money to someone who supports a child molestor.  I guess we all know what Roman Polanski will be doing this Thanksgiving, if he gets out.  Not stuffing a turkey.  Probably stuffing another 13 year old.  Natalie will probably be sitting by, joyfully laughing.  Sick bitch!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Natalie doesn&#8217;t want to help out porn sites on the internet, but she has absolutely no problem helping out a child rapist.  TO those of you who don&#8217;t know, good old Nat signed a petition calling for Roman &#8220;child molestor&#8221; Polanski to be released.  Yes, the same Polanski who drugged a 13 year old girl with part of a quinine pill, and raped her anally, orally, and vaginaly, all while she said &#8220;No! Stop! Stay Away!&#8221;  Of course Portman also likens those of us who eat meat to rape.  She said in a Huffington Post article, &#8220;If we don&#8217;t tolerate rape, why do we tolerate meat?&#8221;  The reason is, dear Nat, is because God gave the animals of the earth to humans to consume for food, THAT&#8217;S why!  Since you&#8217;re a Jew, like me, I guess that means you believe in the bible.  If eating meat is wrong, I guess you and others like you think God made a bad call!  Wow!  I wouldn&#8217;t want to be you on Judgement Day, honey.  But then, why should anyone expect any better from someone who is asking for a child molestor, who never served any time for his crime, to be free.  Natalie, I think you&#8217;re sick, so is Harrison Ford, and all the rest of your ilkish friends who damned your names by signing that immoral petition!  You don&#8217;t have any moral gravity, nothing keeps your head out of the clouds and grounded.  From hereon, I shall boycott all your movies.  I can&#8217;t give my hard-earned money to someone who supports a child molestor.  I guess we all know what Roman Polanski will be doing this Thanksgiving, if he gets out.  Not stuffing a turkey.  Probably stuffing another 13 year old.  Natalie will probably be sitting by, joyfully laughing.  Sick bitch!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: terpalum</title><link>http://www.showbizspy.com/article/195415/natalie-portman-jake-gyllenhaal-is-ugly.html#comment-51542</link> <dc:creator>terpalum</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:28:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.showbizspy.com/article/195415/natalie-portman-jake-gyllenhaal-is-ugly.html#comment-51542</guid> <description>Is this for real?  How could she say that when she looks like a member of the Lollipop Guild.  I&#039;m not saying he&#039;s the hottest many alive, but to say he&#039;s ugly.  She must have been saying that in a joking manner.  A celeb that&#039;s famous for saying things like that is John Mayer.  You totally know he&#039;s kidding if you see/hear him say it, but surely his sarcastic/humorous remarks don&#039;t translate well when written.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this for real?  How could she say that when she looks like a member of the Lollipop Guild.  I&#8217;m not saying he&#8217;s the hottest many alive, but to say he&#8217;s ugly.  She must have been saying that in a joking manner.  A celeb that&#8217;s famous for saying things like that is John Mayer.  You totally know he&#8217;s kidding if you see/hear him say it, but surely his sarcastic/humorous remarks don&#8217;t translate well when written.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached (Requested URI is rejected)
Database Caching 3/9 queries in 0.009 seconds using memcached
Content Delivery Network via cdn.showbizspy.com

Served from: www.showbizspy.com @ 2012-02-15 11:05:29 -->
