Follow us on Twitter: twitter.com/showbizspy

Angelina Jolie: ‘I’m Not Chained to Brad Pitt’

Posted by Adam

Angelina Jolie and Brad PittANGELINA Jolie thinks fidelity is overrated.

The actress — who raises a whopping six children with partner Brad Pitt — says she wouldn’t mind if her partner cheated.

“Neither Brad nor I have ever claimed that living together means to be chained together,” Britain’s Daily Mirror newspaper quotes Jolie as saying. “We make sure that we never restrict each other.

“I doubt that fidelity is absolutely essential for a relationship.

“It’s worse to leave your partner and talk badly about him afterward.”

Jolie admits she often kicks off if she doesn’t get her own way at home.

“The sparks fly at home if the nice Brad fails to see that he’s wrong and reacts in a defiant way,” she revealed. “Then I can get so angry that I tear his shirt.”

Tags:

  • Anak

    Perfect! So touching! You can betray me and I’ll betray you too. So democratic.

  • claudia

    parisssss!!!!!!bitch

  • claudia

    and angelina u and brad wow ur to oooold for him except ur lipss lolzzz

  • roxyrudy

    Finally somebody who speaks honestly about long-term relationships. If both partners understand, then there is no problem. The problems come when partners – one or both – expect to find complete satisfaction with each other for every need – social, sexual or intellectual all the time. I admire Angelina for being so honest – everybody thought Tiger Woods was so loyal, etc then turn on him when he proves to be fallible.Infidelity is and shouldn’t be a deal breaker. Go Angelina – it’s about time we grew up about human sexuality!

  • Grace

    You have got to be kidding me!!!!!!

  • Grace

    She has caused all of this ruckus – breaking up a marriage, and then to say how important fidelity is. This is not a role model. It tells young girls go out and have sex with whomever you want. It’s irresponsible. I almost wonder if this article is actully true due to it’s stupidity. Is this a joke, or taken out of context?

  • Grace

    I don’t believe this article…and I see other websites have the same story. There is no way she said these things. It’s moral susicide. No way….this has to be a joke.

  • karina

    I agree with Angelina … we do not ” Belong ” to anyone
    it is Not the end of the world because someone ” cheats ”
    if anything this mutual arrangement would remove the temptation .. since it is Not Taboo . She Is .. and always has been a Free Spirit… I admire anyone who claims their Freedom… and mutually gives her Partner the same Freedom..

  • kelly

    Some of you say your okay w your man or woman sleeping w someone else then coming home to you. Gross! Whatever happened to commitment! We’re not animals we should be able to control or sexual urges.

  • getalife

    I can believe it that people actually believe this garbage!
    Guys , get a life!

  • betty b

    to Kelly- Actually, we ARE ANIMALS, and behave like them quite often.

    Grace-Since when has Angelina EVER CARED about social suicide? (which you spelled incorrectly, BTW)

    rozyrudy- I agree with you.

    And for role models? its up to parents to create positive role models for their kids, not celebrities. They can do what they want.

  • Nuria

    I agree, parents should give their children values, not celebrities.
    She doesn’t go out and say to people to be like her, she just wants to live her life the way she thinks is right for her and her family.
    It’s a shame that so many people feel threatend by her lifestyle and feel the need to attack her for her past. I can’t believe people would dig up the same old crap every time a story comes out.
    The book came out about them and it totally missed it’s goal, they are all still standing and toghether and I’m happy for them, since it’s non of our business how she and her partner decide what their relationship is.

  • Soledad

    Well isn’t Angelina special. Whether it’s true or not, those of you who applaud her “honesty” are as twisted and immoral in your thinking as she is. No wonder our society is in such bad shape!!

  • bobbie

    these two dont believe in anything marrage, god,fidelity yet she keeps him on a tight leash he dosent go far without her or has to take the kids what about aids or dosent she believe about that either

  • bratt

    Only The Brangeloonies would call Angelina Jolie A Role Model Seriously???? ROTFLMAO No respect……Just no Respect….LMAO

  • kelly

    betty b- it’s unfortunate you think of yourself as an animal. Do you also shit outside or swipe someone if they steal your food. We as “HUMANS” NEED to and SHOULD be able to control ourselves.

  • livitup_1978

    Yes, we have animal urges. But what sets us apart is our ability to reason and come to higher ground. If we are only animals, then we should be able to abandon our children, sh!t in the streets, lie, steal and murder whomever we want. You can’t have it both ways whenever the situation suits you. That’s called SELFISHNESS, which we’re supposed to be striving against. Bytheway…how can some of you applaud her when she herself has been lauding against her father from day one for sleeping around on her mother? How is that NOT hypocritical? Hey Angie, darling–I know you’re mentally unstable and you never eat enough to feed your leftover synapses, but you should get your stories straight: either you’re happy that daddy fulfilled his sexual desires with somebody more talented/beautiful than your momma, or you drop this arrogant sh!t about how you and Brad are “open” and you did nothing wrong in breaking another woman’s heart. M’kay? Damn! And people think she’s intelligent?

  • http://yahoo.com fely baza

    WAY TO GO ANGELINA! UR TRUE COLORS ARE COMING OUT. FIRST YOU BREAKUP HIS MARRIAGE AND THEN YOU DESTROY HIS KIDS LIVES. YOU ARE A SELFISH BI-CH! YOU ARE DEFINITELY EVIL. UR PROBABLY SATAN MISTRESS TOO!

  • ldirk71

    It’s too bad that Jen had to sit in waiting for 5 yrs while Brad got dragged through the mud with Angelina because in the end Brad will go back to Jen whom he should never have left in the first place.