Kate Middleton: Nude Butt Pictures Set to Surface in The Future? CHI Have Nothing on That!


Wednesday, September 19, 2012

KATE Middleton and Prince William did the right thing by getting an injunction out against France’s Closer magazine after the tabloid published topless photos of the busty brunette.

Why? Because one paparazzi agency has a shed load more topless pictures of the British royal — and now they can’t do anything with them.

The snaps were allegedly taken when Kate was honeymoon, a source says.

“We’ve got a ton of pictures that are much, much more revealing than what France’s Closer magazine published recently,” said one pap agency owner.

“We’ve been sitting on them for a while.. we tried shopping them around when this batch of photos hit. We got lots of interest, but now no one will touch them because the injunction.

“Interest was mainly from American tabloids. The British press wouldn’t touch them.”

Mondadori France, French Closer magazine’s publishing company, will be fined €10,000 a day if they publish further topless paparazzi images of Catherine sunbathing or transmit them to a third party via email or any other means.

It was also decided that Mondadori — owned by former Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi — will have to pay €2,000 towards legal fees.

A court in Nanterre, near Paris, opened a separate criminal investigation earlier today over the publication of the images in the magazine after a formal complaint was made on behalf of Catherine and William, who are currently in the final stages of an Asia Pacific tour.
The initial investigation will be carried out by BRDP, a branch of the French police.

The decision will allow a prosecutor to decide whether or not to proceed with a full investigation into whether Closer magazine and the photographer broke the couple’s right to privacy.

The ruling also means that Closer France must not print any more copies of its controversial issue and take the topless pictures off its website; the photos cannot be published in any other magazines or papers in France; the photographs cannot be sold by them to anyone else in the world; and that within 24 hours the offending pictures must be handed over to the Palace.

It is the first time that a member of the Royal Family has sued a publication through the courts in France.

Yesterday, Kate and William’s lawyer Mr Hammelle accused the magazine of intruding on a “highly intimate moment” by taking the topless pictures of Kate while she was on a private holiday at a chateau in Provence.

The lawyer compared the “grotesque invasion” to the relentless pursuit of Princess Diana by photographers.

Recent reports claimed William and Kate won’t have to pay for their lawyers.

According to RadarOnline, Harbottle & Lewis offer their services to the royals for free. This reportedly William and Kate will save up to a cool two million dollars in attorneys’ fees.

(SEE KATE MIDDLETON TOPLESS IN ITALIAN MAGAZINE CHI)

“The royal family has kept their legal team busy in the last few weeks, but lucky for them they don’t have to pay for their services,” a source revealed.

“Harbottle & Lewis provide the royals with legal guidance free of charge – simply because of the prestige they get from having them as their client.

“It’s held in high acclaim to be the legal firm that looks after the royal family’s best interests and has meant they have secured contracts with other high-profile clients because of that relationship.

“However, Harbottle & Lewis must be kicking themselves over that agreement. Fees for the Kate Middleton topless scandal could eventually rise to up to a million-and-a-half pounds.

“Add to that the cost of the damage control they provided for Prince Harry’s naked Las Vegas romp – they could have made an absolute killing.”
[imagebrowser id=1125]


Tags:

, ,




  • cory

    This article is such a lie. Nobody will touch those supposed unreleased photos because of the injunction? That injunction only applies to France and it only applies to those particular photos that were taken on French soil. Also, Silvio Berlusconi would DEFINITELY purchase those photos and publish them in his magazine…and so would alot of other tabloids in America and in Europe. And what paparazzi agency would sit on valuable photos of Kate Middleton for a year? This story is BS.

    • http://twitter.com/AngelAl13125140 AngelAlonso


      goo.gl/0ltwt

    • http://twitter.com/AngelAl13125140 AngelAlonso

      Mike implied I can’t believe that anybody can get paid $9002 in 1 month on the network. did you see this(Click on menu Home)

  • cory

    Read this article in the UK newspaper The Independent. That injunction handed down by the French court does not keep the photographer nor the photographer’s agency from selling the topless Kate Middleton photographs in other countries.
    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/william-and-kate-win-legal-battle–but-lose-war-to-keep-topless-photos-under-wraps-8153383.html

  • bertie

    i wana see the pics but its wrong so i wont

  • SK$R

    She is posing in front of the camera. She knew what was going on! Publicity seeking idiot! Now they launch a lawsuit to make themselves look very important! This girl has spent most of her life in clubs and the arms of men! What do you expect from a gold-digger! They are constantly seeking attention through these stories and make the public become sympathetic with them. It is a set up! Any publicity is good publicity for them.

  • http://www.facebook.com/spy.shoppee Spy Shoppee

© 2014 - SHOWBISPY.COM ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.