Kate Middleton’s Bottom Pictures in Danish Magazine Se og Hør: Report

Share it !

Thursday, September 20, 2012

KATE Middleton‘s naked bottom will features in Danish mag Se og Hør when it hits shelves later today.

According to a new report, a 16-page supplement full of dozens of intimate shots will include a picture of Kate changing her bikini bottoms.

Editor Kim Henningsen took a swipe at Kate when asked if he would print the pictures if they showed the breasts of Denmark’s Princess Mary.

“Mary knows what to do as a royal. She would never be on pictures like this,” said Kim.

“It’s not the British Royal Palace who decide what Se og Hør should publish. That’s my job.

“It is always relevant for us when a duchess and the future Queen of England is topless. If the British royal family want to sue us, then it will happen and we’ll deal with it.”

St James’s Palace has been made aware of the Danish mag’s plans and said it was seeking legal advice last night.

Mondadori France, French Closer magazine’s publishing company, will be fined €10,000 a day if they publish further topless paparazzi images of Catherine sunbathing or transmit them to a third party via email or any other means.

It was also decided that Mondadori — owned by former Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi — will have to pay €2,000 towards legal fees.

A court in Nanterre, near Paris, opened a separate criminal investigation earlier today over the publication of the images in the magazine after a formal complaint was made on behalf of Catherine and William, who are currently in the final stages of an Asia Pacific tour.
The initial investigation will be carried out by BRDP, a branch of the French police.

The decision will allow a prosecutor to decide whether or not to proceed with a full investigation into whether Closer magazine and the photographer broke the couple’s right to privacy.

The ruling also means that Closer France must not print any more copies of its controversial issue and take the topless pictures off its website; the photos cannot be published in any other magazines or papers in France; the photographs cannot be sold by them to anyone else in the world; and that within 24 hours the offending pictures must be

handed over to the Palace.

It is the first time that a member of the Royal Family has sued a publication through the courts in France.

Yesterday, Kate and William’s lawyer Mr Hammelle accused the magazine of intruding on a “highly intimate moment” by taking the topless pictures of Kate while she was on a private holiday at a chateau in Provence.

The lawyer compared the “grotesque invasion” to the relentless pursuit of Princess Diana by photographers.

[imagebrowser id=1130]

Filed Under :

, ,

  • Justice

    Good people, let’s stand up FOR KATE AGAINST THESE SCUMS by refusing to buy these magazines and encouraging EVERYBODY to REFUSE to buy these magazines. This would be a powerful peace protest. By buying these disgusting magazines all people are doing is feeding the life blood of these monstrous paparazzi. DON’T SUPPORT THOSE WORTHLESS SOULLESS CREATURES!!
    Let’s rise up against the monsters and *STOP* buying their magazines. They don’t deserve your money!!! Kate does NOT deserve this treatment.
    Kim Henningsen is a money whore

  • Pat

    Stand Up For Kate and Prince William. Regardless of there status, everyone deserve’s their privacy. You see what happen to Princess Diana. Don’t buy these HORRIBLE MAGAZINES that show these nude pictures. JUSTICE FOR PRIVACY FOR PRINCE WILLIAM and KATE. Regardless of the area they were in, we all know camera have ZOOMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM LENS. We love you Prince WILLIAM and KATE. In the future if you want to post NUDE PICTURES, take them of your family and see how much money you’d get, starting with your daughter being plaster no magazines.

    • stella

      i totally agree with you. it was certainly unfair of those magazines to publish those pictures of kate. i believe that william and kate should be entitled to their privacy. for those who disagree, would you like it if naked pictures of you or members of your family were plastered on these cheap magazines for the world to see?

  • gamechanger

    Whats the big deal in showing Kate’s NIPPLES or ASS ? Isn’t it natural and NOT the best ? Even Royalty have the same type of nipples as normal people !! Whats her bra size ? Any guesses ?

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001413966513 Ted Whalen

    Why do you put these photos on your site?Your just as bad as the Magaxines..I will not have your saite sending me emails any longer.

    • http://www.facebook.com/jefferymetakuffar.anderson Jeffery Metakuffar Anderson

      Learn how to spell…

  • http://www.facebook.com/hussein.soetoroobama Hussein SoetoroObama

    Goddam kuffars showing their asses in public!!! AH, da Pwezdint of the United Staytes, Ah will see that the whore is publicly stoned!!!

  • Clara-b

    she is an anorexic girl!!!!

  • Steve

    Shut it! FFS you idiots, you talk about “Stand up for Kate and Will”, then why the f**k did you click on this link. You knew what would be here and you wanted a look.

    • getalife

      Blow me, “Steve”.
      You knew what would be here and you wanted to take a suck.

  • Bobby

    I think the pics are simply ” Beauty” so Pretty, The Best in Life is Free

  • Ed P

    She was in a completely private location. The parson who took these pictures is no more than a Peeping Tom and should be arrested.

  • ac

    Tight ass. Nice bod. I like it. I wanna see more.

  • Tony

    She’s not naked.
    She’s wearing the Queen’s new clothes



  • Bill

    What the heck is wrong with people who think the naked body male or female is something to be ashamed of. Life is beautiful and for those who are ashamed I hope you take a bath and slept in your wet clothes.

  • Stormz

    Lykk y wud u bare put picz of dat I swear dat itzz ilegal aswell y aint dey bare been nikd n putt in de pen iyy meen de lil kids wil bee in de corner shop and de’ll see dem and dat wud be exposin dem so lykk y do dat if itzz ilegal blud?