Comments on: Jennifer Aniston spends the weekend with David Spade

By: anon

anon — Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000

I saw an article that said there were lots of people there and that was it. I repeated the article to refute more ludicrous allegations of Jen the “maneater”, which she isn’t, simply because the tabloids find it more profitable to portray someone that way. That’s my primary motivation. Refute lies and protect reputations. Getting involved in a public debate about my career, Jennifer’s career, my future and past, to prove a point, to someone I will never meet or know, on a public board isn’t something I care do do to. Nor would anyone. I hope you understand that, and respect the discretion.

By: anonymous

anonymous — Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000

LMAO it’s not fun to be caught out again is it

By: anonymous

anonymous — Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000

LOL, who sucks at life?? Jennifer’s stalker does. You really should research before posting your “I know Jen and everything about her” drivel. THIS WAS A FAKE SIGHTING started by a blogger to up one at Perez Hilton. It was made up, it never happened and you, the so called insider, claims it did but she was there with lots of people. Wrong again but all the proof anyone needs to be assured you don’t know ANYTHING. LMAO.

By: xs

xs — Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000

Jan 15th: I never claimed to know everything. I only know what I know.

By: sasasa

sasasa — Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000

January 15th: I wasn’t at that party and I wasn’t in Mexico. BTW anything else I said, wait and see… Really, all this is very trivial stuff compared to what is going to happen.

By: same crap different day

same crap different day — Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000

they were at a party with lots and lots of other people, and now she is in Vancouver, the implication is that she is Rachel Green, the insatiable man hunter and it is a generated media image to make profit for tabloids

By: anonymous

anonymous — Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000

This is funny, I remember you saying you don’t know Jennifer personally. Now you say you do, how interesting and a great contradiction. I believe that, like I believe you stupidly claimed you knew about her sighting with David Spade at the party “with lots of other people” when the sighting never happened and was made up by a blog owner. Yes, it’s all so trivial when you get caught talking shit and have to defend yourself. It’s been ending in your words for 6 months now, what’s next? Will Jen marry her secret lover whom she’s been with since before Vince – that being another of your claims – Or does Jen comes out as a lesbian and marry her best friend? – Or maybe Jen marries her ex husband AGAIN and steps in as mother to baby Shiloh?

By: sasasa

sasasa — Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000

BTW I am not a stalker, we are closer than that. I feel my life is excellent. So you can laugh mockingly at someone you don’t know, whom you presume to know….. like Jen. This silly game ends soon and I won’t need to write posts to compensate.

By: csdcs

csdcs — Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000

Comment January 16, 2008:: not fun to defend a manufactured relationship for Hollywood cash that isn’t in your pocket ? ………..makes you seem stupid…… :O)