Comments on: Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes in asbestos scare http://www.showbizspy.com/article/61670/tom-cruise-and-katie-holmes-in-asbestos-scare.html Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:21:41 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Bruce Benson Trudy Johnson Nina "Steve" Reyes07 http://www.showbizspy.com/article/61670/tom-cruise-and-katie-holmes-in-asbestos-scare.html#comment-27540 Bruce Benson Trudy Johnson Nina "Steve" Reyes07 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-27540 I'm not a Scientologist but I bet Tom, if anyone, would have some workable technology to defeat any cancer. I’m not a Scientologist but I bet Tom, if anyone, would have some workable technology to defeat any
cancer.

]]> By: Sue http://www.showbizspy.com/article/61670/tom-cruise-and-katie-holmes-in-asbestos-scare.html#comment-28182 Sue Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-28182 re: "I’m not a Scientologist but I bet Tom, if anyone, would have some workable technology to defeat any cancer." Oh yes you are a Scientologist with your "technology." Nutcase! re: “I’m not a Scientologist but I bet Tom, if anyone, would have some workable technology to defeat any
cancer.”

Oh yes you are a Scientologist with your “technology.” Nutcase!

]]> By: Centurian 10 http://www.showbizspy.com/article/61670/tom-cruise-and-katie-holmes-in-asbestos-scare.html#comment-28198 Centurian 10 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-28198 Right, and he's completely sane too. Right, and he’s completely sane too.

]]> By: harris http://www.showbizspy.com/article/61670/tom-cruise-and-katie-holmes-in-asbestos-scare.html#comment-31648 harris Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-31648 The last time I checked <a rel="follow" href="http://www.1articleworld.com/Article/Are-You-Finding-a-Mesothelioma-Lawyer-/344251 ">asbestos cancer</a> was a scary disease that leaves no room for mistakes, they should go have a serious medical check, I know I would. The last time I checked asbestos cancer was a scary disease that leaves no room for mistakes, they should go have a serious medical check, I know I would.

]]>